⚖ LexFed
USC CFR Constitution Topics Search Changes About
C.F.R. Title 23 Chapter I Subchapter G Part 636 Subpart A

Code of Federal Regulations · Subpart

Subpart A — General

23 C.F.R. pt. 636, subpt. A

  • § 636.101 What Does This Part Do?
  • § 636.102 Does This Part Apply To Me?
  • § 636.103 What Are The Definitions Of Terms Used In This Part?
  • § 636.104 Does This Part Apply To All Federal-aid Design-build Projects?
  • § 636.105 Is The Fhwa Requiring The Use Of Design-build?
  • § 636.106 [reserved]
  • § 636.107 May Contracting Agencies Use Geographic Preference In Federal-aid Design-build Or Public-private Partnership Projects?
  • § 636.108 [reserved]
  • § 636.109 How Does The Nepa Process Relate To The Design-build Procurement Process?
  • § 636.110 What Procedures May Be Used For Solicitations And Receipt Of Proposals?
  • § 636.111 Can Oral Presentations Be Used During The Procurement Process?
  • § 636.112 May Stipends Be Used?
  • § 636.113 Is The Stipend Amount Eligible For Federal Participation?
  • § 636.114 What Factors Should Be Considered In Risk Allocation?
  • § 636.115 May I Meet With Industry To Gather Information Concerning The Appropriate Risk Allocation Strategies?
  • § 636.116 What Organizational Conflict Of Interest Requirements Apply To Design-build Projects?
  • § 636.117 What Conflict Of Interest Standards Apply To Individuals Who Serve As Selection Team Members For The Owner?
  • § 636.118 Is Team Switching Allowed After Contract Award?
  • § 636.119 How Does This Part Apply To A Project Developed Under A Public-private Partnership?
© 2026 Michigan Legal Publishing Ltd.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy About michlp.com

Disclaimer: LexFed is for informational purposes only and is not a source of legal advice. Federal law text is sourced from OLRC and eCFR bulk data and may not reflect the most recent amendments. Always verify against official government sources before relying on any provision for legal, compliance, or regulatory purposes. AI-generated summaries are illustrative and not legal interpretations.